Fandom, TV

Is This Planet Protected?

1,081,649 Comments

The new season of Doctor Who began today with a very triumphant debut of the Eleventh Doctor. There is a definite shift in tone from the previous series (or non-series as it was), and I think this is exactly the episode to reset with. The introduction of Amy Pond was the best companion beginning yet, and I already love her. The rest of the plot didn’t really blow my mind, but the nod to the previous Doctors was glorious and brought out an actual cheer. I think Eleven is a very capable incarnation and I look forward to seeing him in action week after week.

I’m already re-watching because I let a lot of information slip past me the first time. I also want to compile a list of “clues” to watch for as the series progresses because I think there will be quite the payoff with this writing team. For instance, there is a blue lens flare that lingers for a considerable amount of time when there is no known source of light for that scene. Hmmmm. I’m also curious about the possible significance of the “Myth” laptop. Each of those things may be inconsequential, of course, or they could be related to the coming Silence. Who knows?

Who knows, indeed!! *ahem*

1,081,649 thoughts on “Is This Planet Protected?”

  6. I’ve been wondering about the difference between repairing and replacing stucco. Your post really clarified that for me! It seems like consulting a Stucco contractor Fort Saskatchewan is crucial for a proper assessment. Go here

    Reply

  23. You really make it appear so easy together with your presentation but I in finding this topic to be really one thing which I believe I’d never understand.
    It sort of feels too complicated and very huge for me.
    I am looking ahead on your subsequent put up, I’ll attempt to get the dangle
    of it!

    Have a look at my web site; ??????? ???????

    Reply

  25. Woah! I’m really enjoying the template/theme of this
    blog. It’s simple, yet effective. A lot of times it’s very hard to get that “perfect balance” between superb usability and visual
    appearance. I must say you’ve done a very good job with this.

    In addition, the blog loads extremely fast for me on Firefox.
    Outstanding Blog!

    Here is my web page :: ??????

    Reply

  34. ????? ???? ??????, ??-?????, ??? ????????. ?????????? ???????? ????? ?? ??? ?????? ? google.com
    because the game at Energy Coins is characterized by low volatility, I often record winnings, however know-how are not necessarily large. so you can not to doubt that we provide honest recommendations which are based on such.

    Reply

  36. though some objected that the reply to “Is it abear?” ought to have been “Yes;” inasmuch as an answerin the negative was sufficient to have diverted their thoughtsfrom supposing they had ever had any tendencythat way.”He has given us plenty of merriment,?? ??

    Reply

  43. Extreme heat is a killer. A recent heat wave shows how much more deadly it’s becoming
    ????????
    Extreme heat is a killer and its impact is becoming far, far deadlier as the human-caused climate crisis supercharges temperatures, according to a new study, which estimates global warming tripled the number of deaths in the recent European heat wave.

    For more than a week, temperatures in many parts of Europe spiked above 100 degrees Fahrenheit. Tourist attractions closed, wildfires ripped through several countries, and people struggled to cope on a continent where air conditioning is rare.
    https://tripscan.xyz
    tripskan
    The outcome was deadly. Thousands of people are estimated to have lost their lives, according to a first-of-its-kind rapid analysis study published Wednesday.

    A team of researchers, led by Imperial College London and the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, looked at 10 days of extreme heat between June 23 and July 2 across 12 European cities, including London, Paris, Athens, Madrid and Rome.

    They used historical weather data to calculate how intense the heat would have been if humans had not burned fossil fuels and warmed the world by 1.3 degrees Celsius. They found climate change made Europe’s heat wave 1 to 4 degrees Celsius (1.8 to 7.2 Fahrenheit) hotter.

    The scientists then used research on the relationship between heat and daily deaths to estimate how many people lost their lives.

    They found approximately 2,300 people died during ten days of heat across the 12 cities, around 1,500 more than would have died in a world without climate change. In other words, global heating was responsible for 65% of the total death toll.

    “The results show how relatively small increases in the hottest temperatures can trigger huge surges in death,” the study authors wrote.

    Heat has a particularly pernicious impact on people with underlying health conditions, such as heart disease, diabetes and respiratory problems.

    People over 65 years old were most affected, accounting for 88% of the excess deaths, according to the analysis. But heat can be deadly for anyone. Nearly 200 of the estimated deaths across the 12 cities were among those aged 20 to 65.

    Climate change was responsible for the vast majority of heat deaths in some cities. In Madrid, it accounted for about 90% of estimated heat wave deaths, the analysis found.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *